Admin review queue
Flagged applications
This prototype shows the reviewer workflow for a sample queue. The design is optimized for fast triage: surface the biggest issue quickly, review the context, and take the next step without unnecessary clicks.
Queue size
3
Sample applications drawn from a hypothetical 50-per-day flagged workflow.
Ready for review
2
These files have enough supporting data for an immediate human decision.
Waiting on applicant
1
These files should move to re-upload before deeper manual review.
Review queue
Applications needing attention
Includes both review-ready files and applicant-action holds so the demo can show the full flagged workflow in one place.
3 openSubmitted documents
Carol Tester
carol.tester@example.com
Requested amount
$1,000
Monthly income
$8,000
Employment
Employed
Mock score
55 / 100
Applicant action needed
Waiting on documents
No supporting documents were uploaded, so the reviewer cannot verify income or account stability.
No documents submitted
In production, this would usually move into a separate applicant-action bucket until the missing files are uploaded.
Score breakdown
Why this file was flagged
Income verification
Weight 30%
0 / 100
No documents to verify
Income level
Weight 25%
95 / 100
Stated income is 8x loan amount, unverified
Account stability
Weight 20%
0 / 100
No bank statement provided
Employment status
Weight 15%
100 / 100
Employed
Debt-to-income proxy
Weight 10%
0 / 100
Cannot assess without bank statement
Reviewer notes
Add notes and choose the next step
Notes are intentionally lightweight here. The goal is to help reviewers preserve context without slowing down the queue.
Saved locally for demo purposes.
96 characters
Reviewer action